顯示具有 owners 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 owners 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2011年3月23日 星期三

Dog owners March on the draft Council

 Sign telling people to clear up after their dogs by owners of dog training is how progress say dog owners marched against Colwyn Bay of dog control orders planned for the County of Conwy.

In an effort to clean up areas within the County projects would limit where dogs can go, and where they may be able to take the lead.


Pet owners feel is very will and want the Council to adopt educational media to help combat the problem of chaos.


Conwy Council said the projects are intended to provide a safer and cleaner environment.


Observations can be sent to the Council and the public consultation which comes to an end on 10 March.


Dog trainer Jessica Bowley, who helped organize the March, he said, had no objection to parts of projects, such as guard dogs leads to the streets, but some of the other controls that was un-workable.


He said it was unclear what land would be excluded and accidentally dog owners could end up with a £ 75-on-site fine walking in the wrong place.


MS Bowley said road was education and worked with Abergele Town Council to set up a pilot project.


Information days were organised in a park place so that the dog owners to learn how to qualify for the pets properly, and learn about the importance of worming their often, it is added.

Continue with the main story
it is important to balance the interests of dog owners and the rest of the public "
end quote Nick Jones-programming and management of environmental enforcement, should be extended Conwy Council also said the period of consultation on draft order dog.

The Club is involved in taking part in regular meetings clean playing fields when collected poo.


"There is a here for and against, but parts of projects of the Council is too vague, and will not stop dog mess," it added.


Nick Jones, Manager of planning and environmental enforcement to Conwy Council said the orders control dog was proposed for "providing a safer and cleaner environment for local residents and visitors".


"It is important to balance the interests of dog owners and the rest of the public, so that through this consultation, we hope to receive information and comments from people in Conwy County Borough proposed Orders," he said.


Mr Jones said the Council acknowledges that the "vast majority of dog owners acting responsibly and keep the dog or dogs under control, which includes clearing up after them in a public place".


"Unfortunately, there are a small number of pettiness dog owners who do not have, causing problems for the community as a whole," he added.


The proposed orders with linked maps are available for the public to inspect civic offices, Colwyn Bay from 0845 to 1715 GMT (Mon-Thurs) and 0845 to 1645 pm (AET).


Or can be considered the proposed control orders on www.conwy.gov.uk/dogwardens


The March took place Saturday along the promenade Colwyn Bay.


View the original article here

2011年3月21日 星期一

Lords ' debate ' penalties in dogbo pet owners

 Pit bull terrier pit bull terrier was among four dogs banned in 1991, the House of Lords discussed plans to give councils new powers to target with the owners of dangerous dogs.

Proposals submitted by Lord Redesdale will see restrictions is known as "dogbos" for owners of dogs.


The Lib Dem peer said laws in place since 1991, is designed to avoid the attacks did not work and owners should be held responsible for pets.


The Ministers said they did not back the proposal, but was consulted about other changes to provide greater protection.


The peer wants to replace the dangerous dogs Act, which has for two decades, despite the fact that these much-condemned by at the time.

' Big problem '

The 1991 law prohibits ownership, reproduction, sale or exchange of four types of dogs: the pit bull terrier, Japanese Tosa, dogo fila Brasileiro and Mexico.


Also gave the police powers to deal with any dog, regardless of race, which took place outside of the control in a public space-the final sanction for a dog to be destroyed. Amendments in 1997 gave the courts discretion on this over the condemnation of the owners.


Some critics argue that the law was poorly conceived and rushed through Parliament without proper scrutiny but its supporters argue that it was necessary and has improved the situation.


Lord Redesdale told peers that there is a clear need for legislation to improve as more than 100 people each week was still admitted to hospital after dog attacks.

"We have a big problem with the control of dogs in this country," he said. "The situation brought about by the Act of 1991 was to create a situation where people own dogs for the wrong reasons. State of dogs now belong to young men purely to cause fear amongst others. "

As a member of a private Bill, the proposed legislation is unlikely to become law.


For the Government, Lord De Mauley said Ministers were "good" public concerns about dangerous dogs and taking into account a number of options, including changes in law, as part of the consultation on the issue.


The last Government blocked plans to force all dog owners to insure against attacking people, they decide that they wanted to punish responsible dog owners and their pets.


Labour urged Ministers to convene a meeting of politicians and animal welfare groups to find a way forward on the issue.


View the original article here

2011年3月9日 星期三

In the veterinary field (5) invoices have to be cold, wet nose through the pay the owners of the

If Max were a 3-year-old boy, his family's insurance would have covered nearly all of the bill. But since this family member walks on four legs, Max's owner, Carrie Parenteau, footed the entire medical cost.


"It's not a question of if you have the money. They're your babies. You find the money," said the Raymond mother of three dogs and a teenage boy. "It'd be like denying my child special tests."


Families in New Hampshire and across the country are facing higher medical costs, fueled partly by advances in technology that often extend people's lifespans. Similar advances in veterinary medicine allow more animals to live longer, but often at a higher cost to families because few carry insurance for pets.


"People with insurance or people with HMOs are not used to paying the actual costs of procedures, and when they bring their pet to a place that provides that kind of technology, then they're faced with what it actually costs to have an MRI done or to have major orthopedic surgery done, which is much lower in veterinary medicine than it is in humans, but much higher than what most people have ever seen," said Brad Taylor, co-owner of Capital Area Veterinary Emergency Service (CAVES) in Concord.


Parenteau found that was true.


"When my kid goes in for an X-ray, his insurance covers most of everything," she said.


Three out of five U.S. households owned a pet in 2008, according to a 2009-10 National Pet Owners survey. Put another way, there were more dogs than kids younger than 18 living in the United States.


In 2009, pet owners spent more than $12 billion on vet care -- $2 billion more than Americans spent on cosmetic surgery.


Former Manchester Public Health Director Fred Rusczek now heads Child Health Services, which serves the medical needs of 2,474 Manchester-area children living below the poverty level. He said $893 would pay for health care, such as immunizations and routine exams, as well as family support services for one child for a year at Child Health Services.


Rusczek also knows about big vet bills, spending at least $5,000 since 2007 on specialized care for two cats, Lexus and Giz, and an English setter, Grady.


"Certainly I've thought of all this: What is the ethical investment to make in one's pet when you know kids can benefit from improved access to make them healthy?" Rusczek said.


"It's fascinating because pet care is following the human care," he said. "I realize what can be done with modern medicine today for dogs."


Families with tighter budgets have more difficulty paying for pet care, translating into more people skipping or delaying their animal's annual exams, according to Melissa Magnuson, a veterinarian who owns All Pets Veterinary Hospital in Nashua and Canobie Lake Veterinary Hospital in Windham.


"It's very similar to human medicine," she said.


And that, she said, results in repercussions. "They wait and wait and wait until an animal is really sick, and it actually costs them a lot more treating a very sick patient, where picking up something early, it will cost a lot less."


Routine dentistry can run $200 to $400, "where if you need an abscessed tooth pulled, that's going to run you $800 or $1,000," Magnuson said.


More people are signing over their pets to Magnuson's vet practices because they can't or won't pay large medical bills. She in turn finds the animals homes where vet care can be afforded.


"If people are into their pets and want to save their pets, they find a way," she said.

110305vetcare_300px (BOB LAPREE) Veterinarian Dr. Deborah Kelloway, assisted by Jamie Dekraai, start a nasal endoscopy on "Max", a dachshund, to try to determine the cause of his persistent sneezing. (BOB LAPREE)


Max's owner turned to plastic.


"To tell you the truth, it's on the credit card and probably will get paid off when the income tax comes in," Parenteau said. "A lot of people do think I'm on the crazy side."


During Max's procedures at the Center for Advanced Veterinary Care in Manchester, anesthesia immobilized his 15.6-pound body. Monitors checking his oxygen level and heart rate were wrapped around his tail.


The dog was placed in the CT scanner, which cost the center's owner, Deborah Kelloway, $100,000 used. A CT scan typically runs clients "a little under $800," said Kelloway, a veterinarian. (That contrasts with a median charge of $1,398 for a human scan in New Hampshire, according to New Hampshire PricePoint, which provides estimated pricing data. Kelloway said other charges, including someone interpreting the scan, would raise the price tag for the human scan.)


After the scan, Kelloway ran a miniature camera up the dog's nose and used alligator forceps to snip a piece of tissue for a lab to biopsy, producing a bloody nose. Max later was put on a regiment of steroids and steroid nasal drops.


"It's almost like an allergic reaction to the environment, just like people have hay fever," Kelloway said of the diagnosis.


Last week, Max's owner said her pooch was "doing much better," and she hopes to wean him from his twice-a-day drops.


Over the past year, Gov. John Lynch and his wife, Susan, spent at least $10,000 of their money on treating four pets for serious conditions at CAVES in Concord.


"The animals meant a lot to us. They're part of our family," said Mrs. Lynch, a medical doctor. "We were able to pay, but for many, many people, every treatment, every pill, every day of stay at a hospital like CAVES is a big decision, and often it's not an option."

110306DrLynch_300px (THOMAS ROY) Dr. Susan Lynch, left, wife of the governor, with their dog, Katie, talks to veterinary tech Renee Kucharski, far right, and veterinarian Karen Gibson at Capital Area Veterinary Emergency Service in Concord. (THOMAS ROY)


Two family cats, Harry Potter and Angel, contracted cancer and were put down. A third cat, Ginny, is being treated for a liver problem. And Katie, a golden retriever, recovered from reconstructive knee surgery.


"The technology for most of what we have in human medicine I think exists for animal medicine from what I've learned from personal experience," Mrs. Lynch said.


People, she said, evaluate humans and pets differently when dealing with medical issues.


"With pets, it's more of a quality-of-life decision," she said. "We'll put humans through really ungodly procedures to prolong their life-spans. We're much better with that with animals. We understand about quality of life and when the right time is to make that decision to back off and stop treating."


The Concord locale also treated 10 police dogs for free over the past two years for such things as porcupine quills, items swallowed and a ruptured spleen, said state police Trooper Dan Needham, who oversees K-9 training.


Needham said his former K-9 partner, King, tore ligaments. "That night, I was told his career was over," he said.


But a vet medically repaired the Dutch shepherd, giving him an additional 18 months on the job, during which time he helped police locate ill-gotten cash and illegal drugs.


More people cited economic reasons for giving up their pets to the Humane Society For Greater Nashua last year. In 2005, only 10 people said they couldn't afford to care for their pets, compared with 93 in 2010. In 2005, 37 people cited moving or landlord restrictions, while 112 gave that reason last year.


And other pet owners are seeking help to pay pet care bills.


"We get phone calls on a daily basis from people who are not willing to give their animals up but are looking for assistance or direction or guidance on where they can go in terms of medical care," said Tammy DeVito, the animal care director.


"Money's always part of the equation," Kelloway said. "How much time are you going to get for what kind of money and what kind of suffering?"


Payment is expected when the animals are treated.


"A typical bill is $2,000 for something big," she said. "We try to work with each pet owner at the level they can afford care."


People expect vets to produce medical results comparable to their children's doctors, she said.


"We have a lot of stress that physicians don't have," Kelloway said. "I don't have a whole (professional support) system for a buffer that goes with a whole set of expectations."


Vets are involved in everything with their practices, including, "'How much is the bill going to be?'" Kelloway said. "Doctors in hospitals, they don't have that. They just do their job."


Taylor also mentioned the intimacy of vet care.


"One of the things I like in veterinary medicine, even though it's a trial, is decisions are made by the pet owner and their veterinarian, and we stand across from the exam room table from each other and make the most reasonable decisions," Taylor said. "A doctor and his patient never talk about whether it's financially reasonable to do a certain test or a certain procedure."


View the original article here